ĢƵ

On May 27, Deep Saini, President and Vice-Chancellor of ĢƵ, presented the 2025 President’s Prize for Outstanding Emerging Researchers to (r to l) Guojun Chen, Mahsa Dadar and Phoebe FriesenThe President's Prize for Outstanding Emerging Researchers

The Office of the Vice-President (Research and Innovation) created a new University-wide prize for outstanding emerging researchers in 2013 to encourage and celebrate our most outstanding early-career researchers.

ĢƵ

About the Prize

Description

Up to three President’s Prizes for Outstanding Emerging Researchers will be presented yearly to early-career faculty members (no more than ten years beyond the doctorate or other highest degree) who have distinguished themselves by their exceptional contributions to research. The President’s Prizes for Outstanding Emerging Researchers is a cash prize of $5,000.

The selection committee will endeavour to ensure that the group of individuals honoured each year represents a diversity of research foci and disciplinary or interdisciplinary approaches. It will also endeavour to ensure that both traditional and non-traditional forms of research are given proper weight and that a diversity of indicators of research impact is used in assessing a nominee’s candidacy.

Preference will be given to EMERGING nominees, that is, people who have not yet received a major non-discipline-specific external prize or award, i.e. a prize or award external to ĢƵ which is not reserved for members of a specific discipline*.

(*While this list is not exhaustive, some examples are: Sloan Research Fellowship; Guggenheim Fellowship; Dorothy Killam Fellowship; Jacobs Foundation Research Fellowship; Nature Research Awards for Inspiring Science; Simons Fellows; Pivot Fellowship Schmidt Science Polymath; CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholars; NSERC Arthur B. McDonald Fellowship; Steacie Prize.)

Eligibility

Nominees must be no more than ten calendar years beyond their doctorate or other highest degree awarded, be autonomous regarding their research activities* and have an academic appointment at ĢƵ which allows the nominee to supervise students and to publish research results.†

*Researchers whose status or position gives them autonomy to design and direct their own research. Researchers who are under the direction or supervision of another (i.e., research technicians, postdocs, and research associates) are excluded.

† Career interruptions such as parental leave, extended sick or disability leave, clinical training or family care can be excluded from the ten-year limit and must be explained in the nomination letter. In the case of nominees holding more than one doctorate, the ten-year limit is calculated from the first doctorate awarded.

Nominations

Each Dean is invited to make one nomination per year with the following exceptions for ĢƵ’s largest Faculties:

  • Medicine, up to three nominations
  • Arts, up to two nominations
  • Science, up to two nominations

    Nomination Procedure

    Deadline to submit nominations for the 2026 Prize: February 3, 2026.


    Format Instructions:

    • Font and Size: 12-point Arial font or equivalent.
    • Margins and Spacing: 2.5 cm maximum.

    Each nomination dossier shall include the following documents:

    1) A letter of nomination (maximum three pages) from the Dean of the researcher’s Faculty outlining:

    • The rationale for the nomination.
    • The quality of the nominee’s research contributions and promise of future distinction.*
    • How the nominee’s teaching and supervision has played a role in their research excellence.
    • Why the nominee deserves an award as an outstanding emerging researcher (i.e., people who have not yet received a major non-discipline-specific external prize or award).
    • How research excellence is measured in the nominee’s field of research.
    • Confirmation that the nominee will keep their Faculty’s Spring Convocation date available until the selection committee has made its decision or explain why it is impossible for the nominee to do so.

    *Note: In assessing Criterion "the quality of the nominee’s research contributions and promise of future distinction, the committee will consider both traditional and non-traditional indicators of impact (as provided in the nomination dossier) to ensure that a diversity of research accomplishments, recognitions and outcomes are valued. Nominators may refer to resources such as the , Calls to Action #40-47 of the Provost’s Task Force on Indigenous Studies and Indigenous Education Final Report 2027, and the ĢƵ document “Examples of the Range of Research Accomplishments, Recognition and Impacts Valued at ĢƵ” (updated January 2024) when elaborating on this criterion.

    2) A one-page summary description of key aspects of the nominee’s accomplishments and CV, such as: the nominee’s most significant contributions with an explanation of their significance; publishing, funding, and supervision conventions in their field of research; impact measures in the nominee’ field, including those that go beyond traditional metrics; additional information that should be flagged to the selection committee; etc.

    3) The nominee’s curriculum vitae (maximum 20 pages). The CV should contain the following information, but is not limited to it:

    • Publications and invited scholarly presentations and lectures.
    • External funding and Prizes and awards received.
    • Graduate students and postdoctoral fellows supervised.
    • If applicable, career absences and their length.

      4) Two letters of reference from individuals who are experts in the nominee’s field.

      • Referees should not be present or former collaborators of the nominee. (Note: anyone with whom the nominee has co-authored publications or who has supervised the nominee is considered a collaborator of the nominee.)
      • Referees should be external to ĢƵ.
      • A short biographical note should be included for each referee (maximum 250 words).

      Note: Persuasive letters of nomination and of reference, rather than merely summarizing factual information about the nominee’s scholarly output and publication record, will1)explain convincingly to a non-specialist audience the significance of the nominee’s discoveries and work, and 2)make clear in what way(s) the nominee’s work is especially original, creative, or path-breaking


      Nomination dossiers must be received by the Prizes and Awards Officer in the Office of the Vice-President, Research and Innovation, meredith.chatman [at] mcgill.ca (Meredith Chatman), no later than the first Tuesday ofFebruary.

      Deadline to submit nominations for the 2026 Prize: February 3, 2026.

      Any questions and requests for guidance in preparing nominations can be addressed to meredith.chatman [at] mcgill.ca (Meredith Chatman.)

      Selection Process

      Merit is the core consideration for the award. If more than three candidates are deemed equally meritorious, the selection committee will refer to the equivalency protocol, which uses equity self-identification data collected from award applicants at the time they submit their dossiers, and consult with an equity advisor to inform its decision.

      Self-identification as a member of an equity group is personal and confidential information and is only to be used at this point in the selection process. To facilitate this process, nominees may choose to complete ĢƵ’s Equity and Diversity Survey.

      Members of the Selection Committee

      • President or delegate
      • Vice-President (Research and Innovation) or delegate
      • Two previous recipients of this award or of other significant research awards
      • Two senior researchers (more than 15 years since their doctorate or other highest degree)

      In accordance with the usual practice for nomination-based prizes and awards, nominators and successful nominees (but not unsuccessful nominees) will be informed of the selection committee’s decisions.

      Note: nominees are expected to be available to attend their Faculty’s Spring Convocation. The letter of nomination must confirm that the nominee will keep these dates available until the selection committee has made its decisions, or explain why it is impossible for the nominee to do so.

      Need more information about the President's Prize for Outstanding Emerging Researchers?

      Back to top